Education Technology Final Research Paper
Table of Content
I. Introduction................................................................................................................. 3
II. Recommendation 1:Providing Frequent Opportunities for Self-Assessment and Reflection......................................................................................................................... 4
1. Statement in everyday language:................................................................................. 5
2. Statement in technical language:................................................................................. 5
3. Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:.......................................................................... 5
Application example related to the chosen context or content area:............................... 6
III. Recommendation 2:Promoting Active Learning through Interactive Technology Tools............................................................................................................ 7
Statement in everyday language:..................................................................................... 7
Statement in technical language:..................................................................................... 8
Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:.......................................................................... 8
Application example related to the chosen context or content area:............................... 9
IV. Recommendation 3: Providing Timely and Constructive Feedback Using Technology..................................................................................................................... 10
Statement in everyday language:................................................................................... 10
Statement in technical language:................................................................................... 10
Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:........................................................................ 10
Application example related to the chosen context or content area:............................. 11
V. Recommendation 4: Promoting Collaborative Learning through Technology Tools............................................................................................................................... 12
Statement in everyday language:................................................................................ 12
Statement in technical language:................................................................................... 13
Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:........................................................................ 13
Application example related to the chosen context or content area:............................. 13
VI. Recommendation 5:Providing Opportunities for Authentic and Real-World Learning Experiences Using Technology................................................................... 15
Statement in everyday language:................................................................................... 15
Statement in technical language:................................................................................... 15
Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:........................................................................ 15
Application example related to the chosen context or content area:............................. 16
VII. Conclusion............................................................................................................. 17
IV. Summary of Recommendations and Their Potential Impact................................... 17
Recommendation 1: Providing Frequent Opportunities for Self-Assessment and Reflection........................................................................................................................ 18
Recommendation 2: Promoting Active Learning through Interactive Technology Tools............................................................................................................................... 18
Recommendation 3: Providing Timely and Constructive Feedback Using Technology..................................................................................................................... 19
Recommendation 4: Promoting Collaborative Learning through Technology Tools... 20
Recommendation 5: Providing Opportunities for Authentic and Real-World Learning Experiences Using Technology...................................................................................... 21
References...................................................................................................................... 22
Education Technology Research Study Material
I. Introduction
Modern society largely relies on education technology to transform the way students learn and acquire knowledge. The integration of technology in the classroom has the potential to enhance student understanding, promote positive behavior, and facilitate the practical application of learned concepts. Arguably, it informs this paper's sets the stage for exploring recommendations on how teachers can leverage technology to achieve these outcomes.
This paper explores around the use of technology in education as a means of supporting student learning and engagement. Rec eat advancements in digital tools, educational platforms, and online resources present teachers with a wide range of opportunities of enhancing their instructional practices and optimize student outcomes. The focus is on identifying specific strategies that empower teachers to better help their students understand, behave, and apply what they learn using technology as a facilitator.
The integration of the recommendations target student population across different age groups from primary to secondary schools or even higher education institutions. The conceptual design of these recommendations discussed in this paper are applicable across multiple levels of education with emphasis onthe importance of transferable skills rather than content-specific knowledge by teachers. They are also adaptable to different subjects, such as mathematics, science, literature, or even interdisciplinary topics.
The papers main goal is to provide teachers with evidence-based recommendations founded on principles from cognitive psychology, educational psychology, and the Learning Sciences. The incorporation of these recommendations by into their instructional practices, teachers create an inclusive and engaging learning environment that fosters deep understanding, positive behavior, and meaningful application of learned concepts.
Technology can serve as a catalyst in achieving these objectives.
II. Recommendation 1:Providing Frequent Opportunities for Self-Assessment and Reflection
1. Statement in everyday language:
"Teachers should provide frequent opportunities for student self-assessment and reflection to enhance learning and metacognitive skills using technology."
2. Statement in technical language:
"Teachers should incorporate technology-supported self-assessment and reflection activities into their instructional practices to promote metacognitive awareness and enhance student learning outcomes."
3. Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:
Use of Self-assessment and reflection technology facilitate student learning and enhance their understanding of concepts. Zimmerman's social cognitive model of self-regulated learning (Zimmerman, 2000), avers that self-assessment and reflection allow students to monitor their own learning progress, evaluate their understanding, and identify areas for improvement. Accordingly, technology-supported self-assessment and reflection activities enable , teachers to provide students with timely feedback and scaffold their metacognitive development.
One study by Panadero and Romero (2014) examined the effects of self-assessment on student learning outcomes and found that students who engaged in self-assessment activities demonstrated higher academic achievement and a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Another study by Schraw and Dennison (1994) highlighted the importance of reflection in promoting metacognitive awareness. The researchers found that reflective activities improved students' ability to recognize their own strengths and weaknesses, leading to better self-regulated learning.
Application example related to the chosen context or content area:
Teachers can use technology In a mathematics classroom, teachers to support student learning and metacognitive development. For instance, a teacher can introduce an online math quiz platform that provides immediate feedback to students after each question allowing them to assess their own understanding, identify misconceptions, and make adjustments in real-time.
Furthermore, teachers can introduce students todigital portfolios or blogs, that help students to reflect on their problem-solving strategies and learning experiences. After completing a math project, the teacher can ask students to write blog posts or record video reflections that highlight the strategies they used, challenges they encountered, and insights gained. The exercise help students develop a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts and become more self-aware of their learning strategies.
Multiple studies show that technology-supported self-assessment and reflection activities positively impact student learning outcomes. For example, a study by Mason, Boscolo, and Tornatora (2015), the researchers found that students who engaged in reflective blogging demonstrated improved problem-solving skills and higher levels of metacognitive awareness in mathematics. Similarly, Tze, Kuo, and Wang (2011) conducted a meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of self-assessment on student achievement and found a significant positive correlation between self-assessment practices and academic performance.
The use of technology-supported self-assessment and reflection activities, helps teachers to foster a culture of metacognition and empower students to take ownership of their learning. Subsequently, students become more engaged in the learning process, develop a deeper understanding of concepts, and gain valuable metacognitive skills that they can transfer to other subject areas.
III. Recommendation 2: Promoting Active Learning through Interactive Technology Tools
1. Statement in everyday language:
"Teachers should promote active learning through interactive technology tools to enhance student engagement, critical thinking, and knowledge application."
2. Statement in technical language:
"Teachers should utilize interactive technology tools to facilitate active learning strategies, such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and inquiry-based learning, to promote student engagement, critical thinking, and knowledge application."
3. Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:
Active learning approaches have been widely recognized as effective strategies to engage students, encourage critical thinking, and promote deep understanding of content. The cognitive load theory (Sweller, 1994) supports the notion that active learning activities can reduce extraneous cognitive load, allowing students to allocate cognitive resources more effectively for meaningful learning. By leveraging interactive technology tools, teachers can create immersive learning experiences that foster active participation, collaboration, and knowledge application.
The findings of astudy by Prince (2004) averred that students who engaged in active learning strategies demonstrated higher achievement, better retention of information, and increased critical thinking skills compared to traditional lecture-based approaches. Hmelo-Silver, Duncan, and Chinn (2007)made similar observations in his publication assessing the impact of technology-supported problem-based learning. Precisely, he posited there were significant observable improvements in student engagement, problem-solving skills, and transfer of knowledge.
4. Application example related to the chosen context or content area:
In a science classroom, teachers can employ interactive technology tools to facilitate active learning experiences. For example, students can use virtual laboratory simulations to conduct experiments and analyze data. Through this hands-on approach, students engage in the scientific process, develop critical thinking skills, and apply their knowledge to real-world scenarios. Additionally, teachers can utilize online collaboration platforms to encourage student collaboration and problem-solving. Students can work together on inquiry-based projects, conduct research, and present their findings using multimedia tools.
Research has shown the positive impact of interactive technology tools in promoting active learning. In a study by Lou, Bernard, and Abrami (2006), researchers investigated the effects of computer-supported collaborative learning on student achievement and found significant improvements in student performance and knowledge acquisition. Similarly, Schmid et al. (2014) examined the impact of inquiry-based learning using virtual simulations and reported increased student engagement, conceptual understanding, and transfer of knowledge in science education.
By integrating interactive technology tools into instructional practices, teachers create an environment that stimulates student engagement, critical thinking, and knowledge application. These tools provide opportunities for students to actively construct their knowledge, collaborate with peers, and make connections between concepts and real-world contexts.
IV. Recommendation 3: Providing Timely and Constructive Feedback Using Technology
1. Statement in everyday language:
"Teachers should provide timely and constructive feedback using technology to enhance student learning, motivation, and self-regulation."
2. Statement in technical language:
"Teachers should employ technology-supported timely and constructive feedback strategies to promote student learning, enhance motivation, and facilitate self-regulated learning processes."
3. Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:
Feedback is a critical component of the learning process, allowing students to receive information about their performance and make adjustments for improvement. The feedback intervention theory (Kluger & DeNisi, 1996) posits that timely and constructive feedback can enhance student motivation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation. By utilizing technology-supported feedback strategies, teachers can provide immediate and personalized feedback, fostering a growth mindset and facilitating students' ability to monitor and regulate their learning.+_
One study by Hattie and Timperley (2007) examined the impact of feedback on student learning and found that effective feedback had a significant positive effect on student achievement. Additionally, Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick (2006) conducted a review of research on feedback in higher education and emphasized the importance of timely, specific, and actionable feedback in promoting student engagement and self-regulation.
4. Application example related to the chosen context or content area:
In a language arts classroom, teachers can utilize technology tools to provide timely and constructive feedback on students' writing assignments. For instance, teachers can leverage online platforms that allow them to annotate students' written work electronically, providing comments and suggestions directly on the text. This type of feedback helps students understand their strengths and areas for improvement, encourages revision, and supports the development of effective writing skills.
Furthermore, teachers can use video or audio recording tools to provide spoken feedback, which can be particularly valuable for language learners or students with diverse learning needs. By incorporating technology-supported feedback strategies, teachers provide students with immediate access to personalized feedback that can be revisited and reflected upon, promoting self-regulated learning.
Research supports the effectiveness of technology-supported feedback strategies in enhancing student learning outcomes. In a study by Wiliam (2011), formative assessment strategies that included timely feedback had a significant positive impact on student achievement. Similarly, Hewson and Charlton (2015) investigated the impact of audio feedback on student engagement and reported increased student motivation, deeper understanding, and improved performance.
By utilizing technology-supported timely and constructive feedback strategies, teachers create a supportive learning environment that promotes student engagement, self-regulation, and continuous improvement. Students receive personalized guidance and can actively participate in the learning process, leading to enhanced motivation, academic growth, and the development of valuable metacognitive skills.
V. Recommendation 4: Promoting Collaborative Learning through Technology Tools
1. Statement in everyday language:
"Teachers should promote collaborative learning through technology tools to enhance student engagement, social interaction, and knowledge construction."
2. Statement in technical language:
"Teachers should leverage technology tools to facilitate collaborative learning environments that promote student engagement, social interaction, and knowledge construction."
3.Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:
Collaborative learning encourages active participation, peer interaction, and the construction of knowledge through social processes. According to Vygotsky's sociocultural theory (Vygotsky, 1978), learning occurs within a social context, and interactions with more knowledgeable peers can facilitate higher-order thinking and problem-solving. By incorporating technology tools that support collaborative learning, teachers create opportunities for students to engage in meaningful discussions, negotiate meaning, and co-construct kknowledgey
One study by Johnson, Johnson, and Stanne (2000) conducted a meta-analysis of research on cooperative learning and found positive effects on student achievement, social skills, and attitudes toward learning. Another study by Dillenbourg, Baker, Blaye, and O'Malley (1996) explored the impact of computer-supported collaborative learning and reported enhanced student engagement, improved performance, and increased knowledge transfer.
3.Application example related to the chosen context or content area:
In a social studies classroom, teachers can leverage technology tools to foster collaborative learning experiences. For example, students can use online discussion boards or collaborative platforms to engage in virtual debates, analyze primary source documents, and exchange perspectives on historical events. Through these interactions, students develop critical thinking skills, enhance their understanding of different viewpoints, and construct a deeper knowledge of the subject matter.
Additionally, teachers can utilize video conferencing tools to connect their students with learners from different cultures or geographical locations. Collaborative projects, such as researching global issues or comparing cultural practices, allow students to broaden their perspectives and develop cultural competence through meaningful interactions.
Research has consistently highlighted the positive impact of technology-supported collaborative learning on student outcomes. In a study by Lou, Bernard, and Abrami (2006), researchers reported that computer-supported collaborative learning had a significant positive effect on student achievement and engagement. Similarly, Kirschner, Strijbos, Kreijns, and Beers (2004) conducted a meta-analysis of studies on collaborative learning in higher education and found improved learning outcomes, increased satisfaction, and enhanced critical thinking skills.
By leveraging technology tools to promote collaborative learning, teachers create dynamic and inclusive learning environments that foster student engagement, social interaction, and knowledge construction. Students develop teamwork skills, gain diverse perspectives, and collectively construct deeper understandings of complex concepts.
VI. Recommendation 5:Providing Opportunities for Authentic and Real-World Learning Experiences Using Technology
1. Statement in everyday language:
"Teachers should provide opportunities for authentic and real-world learning experiences using technology to enhance student motivation, relevance, and transfer of knowledge."
2.Statement in technical language:
"Teachers should incorporate technology tools to facilitate authentic and real-world learning experiences that promote student motivation, relevance, and knowledge transfer."
3. Justification with references to cognitive psychology, educational psychology, or Learning Sciences theories and studies:
Authentic and real-world learning experiences have been shown to enhance student motivation, engagement, and the transfer of knowledge to new contexts. The situated cognition theory (Lave & Wenger, 1991) emphasizes the importance of learning within authentic contexts, allowing students to apply their knowledge and skills in meaningful ways. Using technology tools to create authentic learning experiences, by teachers provide students with opportunities to connect their learning to real-world applications, fostering motivation and deeper understanding.
One study by Savery and Duffy (1995) explored the impact of problem-based learning and found that authentic learning experiences promoted higher levels of motivation and engagement. Another study by Herrington and Oliver (2000) investigated the effects of authentic learning environments and reported enhanced student learning outcomes, increased problem-solving skills, and improved transfer of knowledge.
4. Application example related to the chosen context or content area:
In a business education class, teachers can utilize technology tools to provide authentic learning experiences. For example, students can engage in virtual business simulations, where they make strategic decisions, analyze market trends, and evaluate the outcomes of their choices. This immersive experience allows students to apply business principles in a realistic context, enhancing their understanding of concepts and developing problem-solving skills.
Furthermore, teachers can integrate technology tools that enable students to collaborate with professionals in the field. Students can participate in video conferences, online mentorship programs, or industry simulations, where they can interact with experts, seek advice, and gain insights into real-world business practices. This exposure to authentic industry settings enhances students' motivation and provides them with a deeper appreciation of the relevance of their learning.
Research supports the positive impact of technology-supported authentic learning experiences on student outcomes. In a study by Schrum, Hong, and Portsmore (2012), researchers reported that authentic learning experiences using technology tools led to increased student motivation, engagement, and knowledge transfer. Similarly, Hmelo-Silver, Duncan, and Chinn (2007) examined the effects of technology-supported problem-based learning and found that authentic learning experiences facilitated knowledge construction, critical thinking, and transfer of skills.
By incorporating technology tools to facilitate authentic and real-world learning experiences, teachers create a dynamic and engaging learning environment that promotes student motivation, relevance, and the transfer of knowledge. Students develop a deeper understanding of concepts, see the practical application of their learning, and are better prepared for real-world challenges.
VII. Conclusion
IV. Summary of Recommendations and Their Potential Impact
This final paper in the previous sections outlines five key recommendations for teachers to enhance student understanding, behavior, and application of learning using technology. These recommendations, rooted in cognitive psychology, educational psychology, and the Learning Sciences, offer practical strategies to optimize instructional practices in various contexts. This section provides a summary of the recommendations and their potential impact on student outcomes.
The incorporation of technology-supported self-assessment and reflection activities promote metacognitive awareness and enhance student learning outcomes. Accordingly, it enable students to monitor their learning progress, evaluate their understanding, and identify areas for improvement. Studies support this recommendation in their findings indicating that engaging in self-assessment activities improves academic achievement and deepens understanding, while reflection enhances metacognitive awareness.
As a result , students become more self-aware learners, actively monitoring their progress and adjusting their learning strategies accordingly. The heightened metacognitive awareness lead to improved academic performance, as students gain insights into their strengths and weaknesses.
Utility of interactive technology tools facilitate active learning strategies, such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and inquiry-based learning, enhances student engagement, critical thinking, and knowledge application. Active learning approaches encourage students to actively participate in the learning process, fostering deeper understanding and promoting higher-order thinking. As studies show, technology-supported active learning improve student achievement, retention of information, and critical thinking skills.
As a result of this recommendation students become profoundly iactive participants in their learning journey, developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. By engaging in collaborative and inquiry-based activities, students gain a deeper understanding of concepts and learn how to apply knowledge to real-world situations. Furthermore, technology-supported active learning fosters student engagement and promotes a learner-centered environment.
The paper also recommend that teachers can enhance student learning, motivation, employing technology-supported timely and constructive feedback strategies. Feedback plays a crucial role in the learning process, guiding students' progress and promoting self-efficacy. Effective feedback has been shown to have a significant positive effect on student achievement, learning outcomes, and self-regulated learning.
The potential implications of integrating this form of technology in education is twofold. First, timely and constructive feedback supports student learning by providing guidance and direction for improvement. Students receive personalized information about their performance, allowing them to make necessary adjustments. Second, feedback enhances student motivation and self-regulation, fostering a growth mindset and encouraging students to take ownership of their learning.
Leveraging technology tools to facilitate collaborative learning environments promotes student engagement, social interaction, and knowledge construction. Collaborative learning allows students to actively participate in discussions, share ideas, and co-construct knowledge. Technology-supported collaborative learning has been found to enhance student achievement, social skills, and attitudes toward learning Collaborative learning experiences foster student engagement, encourage diverse perspectives, and develop teamwork skills. By utilizing technology tools to support collaboration, students gain valuable interpersonal skills and deepen their understanding through interactions with peers. Additionally, collaborative learning cultivates a sense of community and promotes a positive learning environment.
The final recommendation, forthwith incorporating technology tools to facilitate authentic and real-world learning experiences enhances student motivation, relevance, and transfer of knowledge. Authentic learning experiences allow students to apply their knowledge and skills in meaningful contexts. Technology-supported authentic learning experiences have been associated with increased student motivation, engagement, and knowledge transfer.
Authentic learning experiences is significant in preparing students for real-world challenges. It enable students to make connections between classroom learning and real-life applications. Their engagement in tasks that reflect authentic contexts, students develop a deeper understanding of concepts, enhance their problem-solving skills, and recognize the relevance of their learning beyond the classroom.
In a nutshell , these five recommendations provide teachers with evidence-based strategies to enhance student understanding, behavior, and application of learning using technology. Through integrating self-assessment and reflection, promoting active learning, providing timely feedback, facilitating collaborative learning, and offering authentic learning experiences, teachers create engaging and meaningful learning environments. These recommendations have the potential to positively impact student outcomes, including improved academic achievement, critical thinking skills, motivation, self-regulation, and the ability to transfer knowledge to real-world contexts.
References
Mason, L., Boscolo, P., & Tornatora, M. C. (2015). Self-regulated learning through journaling: A new approach to mathematics instruction. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3), 325-360.
Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance, and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133-148.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Tze, V. M., Kuo, L. J., & Wang, W. C. (2011). Is self-assessment a good way to improve students' learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 509-534.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141-176.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., & Surkes, M. A. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, 271-291.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hewson, C., & Charlton, M. (2015). Audio feedback: Rich data for deep learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(2), 184-209.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Elsevier Science.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, Cooperative Learning Center.
Kirschner, P. A., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47-66.
Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141-176.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23-48.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Schrum, L., Hong, S., & Portsmore, M. (2012). A model for developing high-quality authentic science experiences using technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 320-329.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189-211). Elsevier Science.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, Cooperative Learning Center.
Kirschner, P. A., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47-66.
Lou, Y., Bernard, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141-176.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
0
607